Enhancing Automaticity in Middle School Textbooks

Authors

  • Ahmed Moumene

Abstract

Recent approaches in second or
foreign language teaching such as
the Competency-based Approach
seek to enhance automaticity
amongst learners. An examination
of Algerian Middle School English
textbooks Spotlight on English
reveals that their ultimate aim is to
promote automaticity through the
Competency- based Approach.
Automaticity in these textbooks is
said to be achieved through oral
interaction, negotiation, and
interpretation of oral and written
texts as well as their production.
More importantly, the syllabus puts
more emphasis on helping pupils
to use language creatively and not
merely reproductively. In this paper,
we will highlight the notion of
‘automaticity’ in recent SLA
literature, its implementation in the
Algerian school and its eventual
application amongst pupils
following the English textbooks in
the Middle School.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J.R. (1992). Automaticity and the ACT theory. American Journal of Psychology.

: 165-180.

Arab et .al., (2004). Teacher’s Book, Middle School - Year three.

Bailey, N., Madden, C., and Krashen, S.D. 1974. Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult

second language learning? Language Learning, 24/2: 235-43. Reprinted in B. W. Robinett &

J.

Schachter 1983 (eds.), Second Language Learning, Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and

Related Aspects, (pp.316-325). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1983.

Batstone, Rob.1994a. Grammar. Oxford: OUP.

Brown, R. 1973. A first Language. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

DeKeyser, R.M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (eds.): Cognition

and Second Language Instruction (pp-125-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dulay, H. and Burt, M. 1973. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23: 245-

Dulay, H. and Burt, M. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition.

Language Learning, 24: 37-53.

Dulay, H.; Burt, M. and Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. Oxford: OUP

Ellis, Rod.1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.

Ellis, Rod. 1992. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Pedagogy.

Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Goldschneider, Jennifer M. and DeKeyser, Robert M. 2001. Explaining the “natural order

of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants.

Language Learning, 51/1: 1-50.

Hedge, T. 2000. Teaching and Learning the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Hatch, Evelyn and Wagner-Gough, Judy. 1976. Explaining sequence and variation in

second Language acquisition. Language Learning, special issue, 4: 39-57. Reprinted in B.W.

Robinett and J. Schachter (1983) eds., pp. 334-353.

Krashen, Stephen D.1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning.

London: Printice Hall International.

Krashen, Stephen D. 1987. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York:

Printice Hall International.

Kuk, Linda and James, Banning. June, 2009. Student affairs preparation programs: a

competency based approach to assessment and outcomes. College Student Journal.

http:/findarticles.coms/p/search.qa=lindaKuk..

Johnson, Keith. 2001. An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. (2nd ed.

.

Jones, & Voorhees. (2002). Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative

Working Group on Competency- Based Initiatives in Post Secondary Education (NPEC

Report).

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1976. An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of

second language learners. Language Learning, 26: 125-134

Larsen-Freeman Diane. 1978. Implications of the morpheme studies for second language

acquisition. ILT (Review of Applied Linguistics), 39/40: 93-102. Reprinted in B. W. Robinett

and J. Schachter 1983 (eds.) , pp. 326-333. Logan, Gordan D.; Taylor, Stanley E. and

Etherton, Joseph L.1996. Attention in the acquisition and expression of automaticity.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22/3: 620-638.

McLaughlin, Barry. 1987. Theories of Second language Learning. London: Edward

Arnold.McLaughlin, Barry. 1990. Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11/2: 113-128.

Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A textbook for Teachers. London:

Printice Hall International.

Pienemann, Manfred. 1984. Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6: 186-214.

Pienemann, Manfred. 1989. Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and

hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10/1: 52-79.

Richards, Jack C. 1985. The content of language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.

Robinson, Peter.1997. Generalisability and automaticity of second language learning

under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language

Acquisition, 19: 223-247.

Sullivan, John and Burnett, Master. Apr 17, 2006. Recruiting Using a Competency-Based

Approach.http:/www.reproline.jhu.edu.english/8sw.htm.

Tschirner, Erwin. 1998. From lexicon to grammar. In J. Harper; M.G. Lively and M.K.

Williams (eds.), The Coming of Age of the Profession Issues and Emerging Ideas for the Teaching

of Foreign Languages, (pp. 113-128). New York: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Willis, Jane.1996. A Framework for Task-based Learning. Addison Wesley: Longman.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-13

Issue

Section

Articles