Some Effects of Teacher Talk on Learners’ Involvement in Classroom Active Communication

Auteurs

  • Saïd Keskes

Résumé

This paper attempts to understand
the potential reasons for learners’
low participation in class. It explores
the relationship between some
interactive patterns of teacher’s
pedagogical discourse and learners’
involvement in interactive
communication, because research
stresses the importance of
committing learners in the learning
process to achieve efficient learning.
And committing learners means
favouring participation. One way of
dealing with the issue is to destructure
teacher talk and diagnose
factors in it that potentially impede
learners’ participation in class,
focusing on some specifically
psycho-affective traits of teacher,
such as turn-allocation, interaction
patterns, participation roles and
quality of teacher’s and learners’
pedagogical acts. The underlying
hypothesis is that the quality of
teachers’ talk in terms of psychoaffective
features would likely affect
learners’ participation in class.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Allignton, R. (1991). Children Who Find Learning to Read Difficult: Second

Language Responses to Diversity In T.L. Good. and J.E. Brophy. Looking in the

Classrooms. Longman

Allwright, D. (1984). The Importance of Interaction in Classroom Language Learning.

Applied linguistics 5(2): 156-171

Allwright D. (1988). Observation in the Language Classroom: Longman.

Allwright D. (1990). Turns, Topics and Tasks: Patterns of Participation in Language

Learning and Teaching. In

Larsen-freeman, D.: An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research.

London: Longman. 165-187.

Allwright, D (1991). The Death of the Method. Revue de phonétique appliquée, 99-100-

, 79-87.

Allwright, D (1998) Bring Classroom Language Learning to Life." GELI Newsletter

(Grupo de Especialistas en Lengua Inglesa, Havana, Cuba) , Vol. VI, No. 1-2-3-4, pp

- 17. Invited plenary talk presented at TESOL ITALY Conference, Rome, November.

Allwright D & Bailey K. (1991). Focus on the Language Classroom: CUP

Babad, E. (1993). Seating Locations of Sociometrically Measured Student Types:

Methodological and Substantive Issues. British Journal of educational psychology.

Bailey, K.M. (1985). Classroom Centred Research on Language Teaching and

Learning. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed), Beyond Basics: Issues and research in TESOL.

Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Bailey, K. (1997). Reflective Teaching: Situating our Stories. Asian journal of

English language teaching 7, 1-19.

Barnes, D. & Tood, M. (1977). Language in the Classroom. London: Open University

Press

Bellack, A.A. 1966. The Language of the Classroom. New York: Teachers College

Press 181-206

Bialystock, E. (1978). A Theoretical Model Of Second Language Learner. In C.

Chaudron. Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Breen, M & Candlin, C. (1989). The Evaluation of Teacher Training Program. In

Nunan, D. 1990. Understanding the Language Teacher. Prentice Hall.

Brophy, J.E & Good. T. L. (2005). Language Learners’ Motivational Profile and their

Motivated Learning Behaviour. Language Learning. Vol 55. no 4. December 2005

p613-659.

Celce Murcia, M. (1990). “Interaction and Communication in the ESOL” English

Journal 1999 vol 16: 90-97Chaudron, C. (1988). Second Language Classrooms :

Research on Teaching and Learning. CUP

Cooper, M. & Good, J. (1993). Context and Second language Development. Language

learning, Vol 34. No 3. 145-220.

Coulthard, M. & Sinclair J. De Landsheer, G. & Bayer, E. (1974). Comment les Maitres

Enseignent. Analyse des Interactions Verbales en Classe. Bruxelles: Ministère de

l’Education Nationale et de la Culture Française, Direction Générale de

l’Organisation des Etudes.

Edmondson, W. (1999). Twelve Lectures on Second Language Acquisition: Foreign

Language Teaching and Learning Perspectives. Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag

Tubingen.

Ellis, R. (1994) The Study of Second Language Acquisistion. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1999). The Role of Modified Input and Output in the Incidental Acquisition

of L2 Word meanings. Studies in Second Language Learning, 21, 285-301.

Ellis, R; (2004). Learner Uptake in Communicative ESL Lessons. Language Learning.

, 281-318.

Fanselow, J. F. (1977). Beyond ‘Rashomon’ –Conceptualising and Describing the

Teaching act. TESOL Quarterly 11:17-39.

Flanders, Ned A. 1960. Interaction Analysis in the Classroom: a Manual for

Observers, University of Michigan, An Arbor.

Garton, S. (2002). Learner Initiative in The Language Classroom. ELT Journal 56/1

January 2002 : 47-56.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA

Review, 19, 3-17.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis In The Classroom And The Language Learner

Longman

Harris, Z. (1981). Structural Linguistics. In Van Lier. L. (1988). The Classroom and

The Language Learner. Longman

Hellermann, J. (2006) Classroom Interactive Practices for Developing L2 Literacy: A

Microethnographic Study of two Beginning Adult Learners of English. Applied

Linguistics 27/3: 377-404.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition. London:

Pergamon.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London:

Longman.

Krashen, S (1991) Bilingual education. A focus on current research. Washington,DC:

National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976) An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of

second language learners. Language Learning 25: 125-135.

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Long, M. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language

Acquisition Research. London: Longman.

Lagaretta, D. (1997). Language Choice in Bilingual Classrooms. University Press.

Long, M.H. (1985) Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass and C.

Madden (eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 377-93). Rowley, Mass.:

Newbury House.

Long, M.H . (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language

Acquisistion. Handbook of Research on Language Acquisition: vol. 2. Second

Language Acquisition 413-468.

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis (pp. 19-76). In

Long, M. H. (ed.), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Loschoky, M. (1994). Instructional Effects of Cues, Participation and Corrective

feedback: a Quantitative Synthesis". American Educational Research Journal 19: 559-

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, Interaction and Second Language Development: an

Empirical Study of Question

Mackey, A. (2006). From Introspections, Brain Scans, and Memory Tests to the Role

of Social Context: Advancing Research on Interaction and Learning. Studies in

Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 28 No. 2, 369-379.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom.

Carnbridge MA. Harvard University Press.

Mack Howl, A. (2001). How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings, a Casebook of

Methods. London: Continuum.

Mc Lean, A. (1990). Destroying the Teacher: The Need for Learner Centred Teaching.

English Teaching, Forum 198. 16-19

Moscowitz, G. (1976). The classroom Interaction of Outstanding Language Teachers.

Pica, T. (1994). Research on Negotiation: What Does it Reveal about Second

Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes? Language Learning,

,493-527.

Pica, T. (1987). Second Language Acquisition, Social Interaction, and the Classroom.

Applied Linguistics, 8, 3-21.

Politzer, R.L. (1985). An Explanatory Study of Learner Behaviours and Their

Relationships to Gains in Linguistics and Communicative Competence. TEOSL

Quarterly 19: 103- 123.

Prabhu, N.S. (1992). There is no Best Method- Why? TESOL Quaterly 24/2, 161-176.

Ramirez, J.D. (1986) First Year Report Longitudinal Studies Of Immersion Program

For Language Minority Children. Arlington VA: SRA Technologie.

Reder, S. & Davila, E (2005). Context and literacy practices. Annual Review of

Applied Linguistics 25: 170-187.

Schegloff, E.A. (1981). Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of "uh

huh" and Other Things that Come Between Sentences. In Van Lier 1988 The

classroom and the Language learner. Longman

Stevick, E. (1996). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford

University Press. Silver, 2000

Silver, R.E. (2000). Input, Output, and Negotiation: Conditions for Second Language

Development. Second Language Research Forum, 345-371.

Sinclair,J & Coulthard, M (1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse; the English Used

by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Sinclair,J & Coulthard, M (1992). ‘Towards an analysis of discourse’. In Coulthard, M.

(Ed) 1992. Advances in spoken discourse analysis. 1-34. London: Routledge.

Varonis, G. & Gass, S. (2000). Effects of Negotiation on Language Learners’ Output.

Language Learning, 47, 589-639.

Van lier, L. (1988). The Classroom and The Language Learner. New York: Longman.

Van lier, L. (2004). The Architecture of the Language Classroom. Applied Linguistics,

, 152-155.

Wagner-Gough, J. & Hatch, E. (1975) "The importance of input data in second

language acquisition studies." Language Learning 25: 297-308. ..

Warwick-Menard, J. (2007). `Because She Made Beds. Every Day`Social Positioning,

Classroom Discourse and Language Leraning. Applied Linguistics, 53/2, 1-23.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2023-09-13

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles